Sweet baby bajeebus! It looks like this blawg is going to become a reality! I got my loan! In this economy, I wasn’t sure, so it’s good to have it. I’m going to Law School!
My Core Interests
24 01 2009So, my last post brought to my attention that I should illuminate my interests in various types of law. When I say “one of the reasons I’m inclined to study Family Law,” I’m implying that I’m referencing the previously established fact that I’m inclined to study Family Law.
As such, after my first year, here are the areas of law that I’m planning on studying. I assume my first year will be dedicated to the predetermined collection of classes like Torts and Contracts. And I’m also open to the idea that a professor will inspire me to care about an aspect of law that I’m currently not even aware of. However, here are the four areas of interest that I’ll be trying to focus on when I get to law school.
- Family Law: Right now, I think I’d like to be an adoption lawyer helping gay couples and single men navigate the agencies. As such, I figure I should take classes like Family Law, Children and the Law, Divorce Law, the Law and Woman’s Studies, and the Law and Sexual Orientation.
- Health Care Law: Health care is one of those industries that will be very difficult to outsource oversees. (I’m not saying it can’t be done, but it’ll be hard.) I have a few years of work experience in the medical field, so I think this could be fun. Someone’s always going to want to sue a doctor, and hospitals are always going to want to not get sued. Classes I’d be interested in taking include Health Care Law, Disability Law, Elder Law, Employment Discrimination Law, Insurance Law, Labor Law (yay Nurses’ Unions!), Medical Law, Malpractice, and Law, Society and Psychiatry.
- Fun and Funky: Not every class needs to be for a reason. Maybe it just sounds like it would be fun and interesting to think about. Classes like Admiralty, Computer Law, Intellectual Property, Entertainment Law, Islamic Law, Jurisprudence, and Mass Media Law.
- Get a Job: The opposite of Fun and Funky. Sometimes, you have to get a job. As such, there are classes I’m planning on taking so I can hang a shingle or pay some bills. These classes include Administrative Law, Alternative Dispute Resolution, Bankruptcy, Business Planning, Construction Law, Contract Drafting, Corporations, Estate Planning, Intellectual Property, Interviewing and Counseling, Law Office Management, Negotiation, and Wills and Trusts.
I’ve left out all the seminars that sound interesting, because I know those change from year to year, and I’ve also left out a few classes that would be somewhat indicative of what school I’m referring to when I say “The University of Flawging.” Hopefully, I can balance these four areas, though I’m sure there’ll be other factors. Amazing professors, interesting clinics, and scheduling conflicts, along with a plethora of factors I can’t even conceive of.
Comments : Leave a Comment »
Tags: Classes, Family Law, get a job, health care law
Categories : Classes
Increasingly Common
24 01 2009
So, one of the reasons that I’m inclined to study Family Law is that I think a system of institutional rules designed to regulate a system of societal rules is going to get a little wonky when the societal norms and rules begin to fall apart.
Take the Canadian case over common law “divorce.” How is the law supposed to govern the “contract” of marriage when there’s no longer any stigma against not entering into that contract. I think Mindelle Jacobs makes a good point when she says “One of these years, there may be no difference, legally, between couples who marry and those who simply shack up.” I think she’s right. But I think the fun part is going to be the road between then, where there’s no difference, and now, when there’s a huge difference.
Take, for instance, alimony. As I understand it, if Spouse A divorces Spouse B, and is required to pay Spouse B alimony, Spouse A does so until Spouse B remarries (or for a set amount of time). BUT. Those alimony laws were written during a period where it was socially unacceptable for Spouse B to move in with Paramour C. If Spouse B fell in love with Paramour C, then Spouse B would remarry, losing the alimony. But in today’s libertine legal world, Spouse B can move in with Paramour C, without marrying, and without losing the benefits of Spouse A’s alimony, while retaining all the benefits of cohabitation with Paramour C. Not, I would imagine, what the drafters of the laws intended.
These quirky intersections between law and society are one of the major reasons I’m looking forward to taking lots of classes on Family Law.
Comments : 1 Comment »
Tags: canadian law, common law, divorce
Categories : Family Law
Vaguely Related
12 01 2009Best name for a band, possibly ever:
Post Punk, Ergo Propter Punk
Comments : Leave a Comment »
Categories : Uncategorized
24-Hour Crackdown
14 08 2008Holy hell.
I’m not even in law school yet, and bullcrap like this really pisses me off. Do we really live in a country where this happens and nobody bats an eye?
My favorite quotation is from Mayor James Valley, who says:
The citizens deserve peace, that some infringement on constitutional rights is OK and we have not violated anything as far as the Constitution.
How does a reporter not follow up on that statement? I mean, you don’t have to have a J.D. to understand that infringing on constitutional rights is ipso facto a violation of the Constitution.
I’m sure this is only going to get worse the more I learn about the law. I’m going to have to start drinking again.*
I’d like to remind everybody: They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. – Benjamin Franklin
(* I never stopped.)
Comments : 4 Comments »
Tags: rant, wtf
Categories : Rants

